Comments on: Fermilab Encrypted Letter http://jasonsidabras.com/2008/05/20/fermilab-encrypted-letter/ An he promptly vanishes in a puff of logic. Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:54:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Jason http://jasonsidabras.com/2008/05/20/fermilab-encrypted-letter/#comment-95 Jason Wed, 21 May 2008 07:30:31 +0000 http://jasonsidabras.com/2008/05/20/fermilab-encrypted-letter/#comment-95 Seems I made a mistake. Damn 2 in the morning. 0xFE of 254 is the largest. When John Graham originally broke the first part: http://www.jgc.org/blog/2008/05/breaking-fermilab-code.html He got: FRANK SHOEMAKER WOULD CAMVFTCTCAPSBC Then a shift gave him "CALL THIS NOISE" The MVFTCTCAPSBC is 12 letters perhaps corresponding to the center 12. This may clear up the discrepancy of the numbers. I am sticking with employee 1569. Seems I made a mistake. Damn 2 in the morning. 0xFE of 254 is the largest.

When John Graham originally broke the first part:
http://www.jgc.org/blog/2008/05/breaking-fermilab-code.html

He got:

FRANK SHOEMAKER WOULD CAMVFTCTCAPSBC
Then a shift gave him “CALL THIS NOISE”

The MVFTCTCAPSBC is 12 letters perhaps corresponding to the center 12.

This may clear up the discrepancy of the numbers.

I am sticking with employee 1569.

]]>